The orchestrator plans, the agents act
A run starts as a goal, becomes a plan, and executes as a graph of typed steps. The active path is always visible, always logged, always reversible.
Forgiron is an agent operating system for forging and press-forming plants. Specialist agents control billet heating and heat-treat, the press and hammer stroke, and die lubrication and life, watched by fused vision, thermal, ultrasonic and MPI inspection, rehearsed on an as-forged twin, and bounded by a policy engine you control.
Illustrative scenario: Cell F-2 · 2,500 t closed-die press · 42CrMo4 connecting rod, one lot, one approval gate
Design partners wanted · 3 to 5 forges · cells we are looking for
Pre-launch. No customers, pilots or logos are claimed. The first cohort gets a paid pilot on one cell against a baseline agreed in writing.
Every Forgiron run is an ordered, inspectable sequence. This is run_7c2e41 on Cell F-2 · 2,500 t closed-die press · 42CrMo4 connecting rod. Scenario completes in 10 steps with one approval gate. Surface temperature held at 1,205 °C with a 14 °C core-to-surface spread, fill predicted and confirmed complete, one lap precursor at the flash land cleared by a blow-energy trim, lot L-80412 released with full genealogy.
Plant Orchestrator · Pulled the part spec for the 42CrMo4 connecting rod from MES: forging window 1,180 to 1,230 °C, two-blow closed-die schedule, flash land 2.4 mm, temper to 28 to 32 HRC, 1,200 pieces. Locked the qualified process envelope.
Forge Twin · Simulated 24 candidate heat-and-stroke recipes on the as-forged twin for soak time, blow energy and spray timing, ranked on predicted fill, lap risk at the flash land, die load and kWh per piece.
Heat-and-Billet · Induction power on IH-2 stepped down 4% in the final soak stage as the pyrometer read 1,205 °C at the surface. Core-to-surface spread estimated at 14 °C against a 20 °C limit, no overheat, scale growth inside the window.
Die-and-Lube · Lower-die spray dose raised 6% and cooling extended 0.3 s as die surface temperature climbed through 240 °C. Heat-check growth on cavity 2 flagged at 0.31 of the die-change threshold.
Plant Orchestrator · Recipe #9 moves second-blow energy 3% below the standing schedule. Press-schedule changes stay supervised on this part family, so the step was held for the shift forging engineer and approved at 05:47:31.
Forge-and-Press · Two-blow schedule executed with the approved energy. High-speed vision and force curves confirmed complete fill on the first ten pieces; predicted lap risk at the flash land fell from 0.27 to 0.08.
Defect-and-Inspect · Eight cameras, two thermal cameras and the ultrasonic station fused at the edge. One lap precursor at the flash land on piece 212 flagged and cleared by a 1.5% blow-energy trim inside the approved envelope; the piece was routed to MPI and passed.
Robot-and-Handling · Press-to-trim transfer planned and executed by the handling robot at 11 s per piece, temperature loss in transfer 38 °C against a 60 °C limit, interlock zones clear throughout.
Trim-and-Heat · Temper furnace HT-1 zone 2 trimmed 5 °C against the predicted hardness from the recorded heat and stroke history. First hardness checks read 30 HRC, inside 28 to 32.
Quality-and-Conformance · Lot L-80412 released: genealogy written (billet lot, heat curve, stroke record, die cycles, inspection map, approvals, temper record) and dispositioned against IATF 16949 criteria with cited evidence for the quality engineer's sign-off.
Every tool invocation, argument and result is written to an append-only, human-readable log, and every reasoning step is expandable. Nothing about a run is hidden from the forge.
Plan, thought, action, observation, exactly as the orchestrator would record it.
Run the 42CrMo4 connecting-rod lot on cell F-2 inside the qualified window, hold full fill with zero laps at the flash land, and land hardness between 28 and 32 HRC.
Simulate heat-and-stroke recipes on the twin first. Lead with heating so the billet state is right before the stroke, then set spray against die temperature, then execute the approved press schedule. Fuse inspection continuously. Hold any press-schedule change for a human.
The standing schedule runs the second blow hot enough to guarantee fill on a cold billet. With the induction soak held at 1,205 °C the twin predicts the same fill at 3% less energy and lower flash-land lap risk, because the metal arrives more uniform.
twin.simulate(candidates=24) returns recipe #9: stage-3 induction power down 4%, lower-die spray up 6%, second-blow energy down 3%.
Recipe #9 predicts fill 1.00, lap risk 0.08 and 1.9 kWh per piece. Two candidates scored lower on energy but pushed predicted die load past the cavity-2 limit and were discarded.
Execute recipe #9: seven bounded writes permitted on heating, spray, handling and heat-treat; the press-schedule write routed to the shift forging engineer.
Lap precursor at the flash land on piece 212 at 06:21:40. A 1.5% blow-energy trim inside the approved envelope cleared it in 17 s; the piece was routed to MPI and passed.
Scenario complete. Fill confirmed, no laps escaped, hardness 30 HRC. Lot L-80412 released with full genealogy.
Nothing about a Forgiron run is implicit. The goal is declared, the plan is simulated on the twin, each step is typed and bounded, and the outcome is written to the forging's genealogy.
A run starts as a goal, becomes a plan, and executes as a graph of typed steps. The active path is always visible, always logged, always reversible.
L1 shadow, L2 assist, L3 bounded autonomy on low-risk actions, L4 supervised press-schedule adaptation for qualified part families. Each forge sets the level per agent, per tag, per shift, and every write above the threshold waits for a named approver. The four figures above are design targets, not measured results.
Each agent owns a step of the forge, a bounded tool set and a metric the plant already measures. They negotiate for shared actuators through the orchestrator, never directly. Six named products ship them.
Induction and furnace billet heating, temperature, soak
Senses billet temperature, core-to-surface spread, soak and furnace or induction state from thermal imaging, pyrometry and coil or burner telemetry, predicts what the thermal state will do to fill, grain flow and properties downstream, and adapts induction power, furnace zones and soak time to hit forging temperature at minimum energy without overheating or decarburization.
Press and hammer stroke, force, ram speed, die fill, grain flow
Senses press or hammer force, stroke, energy, billet position and die fill in real time, predicts fill, grain flow and lap, fold or underfill risk from the incoming thermal state, and adapts stroke schedule, blow energy and ram speed to hit target fill and grain flow at minimum blows and energy. Stroke-schedule changes stay supervised until the part family is qualified.
Die temperature, wear, heat-checking, lubrication, cooling
Models die temperature, wear and heat-checking from thermal and vision, predicts remaining die life and thermal-fatigue risk, and controls lubricant dosing, spray and die cooling to hold friction and fill while scheduling die changes and refurbishment before they seed underfill, laps or dimensional drift.
Trimming, heat treatment, finishing to hardness and properties
Carries the thermal loop past the press: trimming, austenitize, quench and temper, and finishing, controlled to hardness and mechanical-property targets. The heat-treat loop is delivered through Heatrix; trimming and finishing are part of the platform.
Laps, folds, underfill, cracks and internal defects
Fuses vision, ultrasonic, MPI, thermal and dimensional data into one model of forging soundness. Detects and predicts laps, folds, underfill, cold shuts, surface cracks and internal defects, routes suspect parts for ultrasonic, MPI or dimensional checks, and couples each finding back to the heat, stroke and die state that caused it.
Grain flow, hardness, mechanical properties, dimension
Models grain flow, hardness and mechanical properties against the part spec from process history, inspection and heat-treat results, and holds dimension after cool-down. It reconciles what the control agents want with what the specification allows.
Yield, scrap, die life, energy, line balancing
Prices every candidate move in scrap, die strokes, kilowatt-hours and minutes, allocates dies, batches heats, sequences press and heat-treat queues and balances the moving line against robot availability and downstream capacity.
Hot billet, forging and die handling
Drives robotic and manipulator handling of hot billets, forgings, dies and trim parts, perceiving pose, temperature and grip, planning safe paths around presses and furnaces, and coordinating takt so parts arrive at the right station at the right temperature. Skills are validated in Isaac Sim before they run near a press.
Right-first-time, non-conformance, genealogy, qualification
Builds the forging genealogy record per part and lot, dispositions against AS9100, IATF 16949, NADCAP and ASTM criteria with cited evidence, and assembles the packets a quality engineer signs for customer, first-article and qualification review.
Recipes, die history, standards, operator Q&A
Answers process, metallurgy and standards questions from heating and press recipes, die and forging specs, AS9100, IATF 16949, NADCAP and ASTM documents and quality procedures, with every answer cited to its source and scoped to the tenant.
As-forged part and forge-line simulation
Simulates billet heating, die thermal state, press stroke, fill, stress, die load, trim and heat-treat with GPU-accelerated forging FEM, compares as-forged against as-designed, and auto-optimises the heating, press-schedule and die setpoints the other agents execute so the part hits soundness, dimension and takt before the stroke.
Planning, arbitration, human approval
Plans the run, arbitrates between agents competing for the same actuator, enforces the autonomy level and routes anything above the risk threshold, press-schedule changes first among them, to a named approver.
Forgiron is not a dashboard. Each agent closes a loop a forge already measures in scrap, die changes, kilowatt-hours and inspection escapes. The tables show what each loop watches and what it is allowed to move.
Thermal imaging, pyrometry and coil telemetry are fused at the edge into a live estimate of surface temperature, core-to-surface spread and soak. Heatrix adapts induction power and furnace zones to land the window without overheating or decarburization, and prices every heat in kilowatt-hours.
| Signal | Watches | Moves |
|---|---|---|
| Billet temperature | Pyrometer and thermal camera | Induction power, furnace zones |
| Core-to-surface spread | Estimated from heating curve | Soak time |
| Energy per heat | Coil and burner telemetry | Stage power inside the window |
Force curves, ram position and high-speed vision are fused with the incoming heat state. Forgeon predicts fill, grain flow and lap or underfill risk per piece and proposes the stroke schedule that hits them at minimum blows and energy, validated on the twin and approved by the forging engineer until the part family is qualified.
| Signal | Watches | Moves |
|---|---|---|
| Die fill | Force curve and high-speed vision | Blow energy, ram speed, under approval |
| Lap and underfill risk | Scored per piece | Energy trim inside the approved envelope |
| Grain flow | Modelled from stroke schedule | Schedule candidates ranked on the twin |
Die surface temperature, heat-check growth and lubricant coverage are modelled from thermal and vision between strokes. Diesmith doses spray and cooling to hold friction and fill and schedules the die change in a planned window instead of after the first underfill.
| Signal | Watches | Moves |
|---|---|---|
| Die temperature | Thermal camera between strokes | Spray dose and cooling |
| Heat-check growth | Vision per cavity | Die-change window |
| Lubricant coverage | Vision | Spray pattern and timing |
Vision, thermal, ultrasonic, MPI and dimensional data are fused into one model of soundness. Flawnex detects and predicts laps, folds, underfill, cracks and internal defects, routes suspect parts to the right check, and couples each finding back to the heat, stroke and die state behind it.
| Signal | Watches | Moves |
|---|---|---|
| Surface laps and cracks | Cameras and MPI | Energy trim via Forgeon, part routing |
| Internal defects | Ultrasonic station | Lot hold, root cause to heat and stroke |
| Dimension after cool-down | Dimensional scan | Spec envelope to the control agents |
Two agents will want the same actuator. The orchestrator arbitrates on the run goal, not on who asked first, and the handoff is logged like any other step.
Yield-and-Takt wants to trim second-blow energy to cut kWh per piece and die load on cavity 2.
Defect-and-Inspect wants to raise second-blow energy to clear a lap precursor at the flash land on piece 212.
Lap risk 0.52 outranks 1.0% of energy under the run goal "zero laps at the flash land". Defect-and-Inspect wins the actuator for 40 pieces, inside the approved envelope.
Actuator returned. Yield-and-Takt recovers energy through the induction soak stage instead. Fill holds complete.
Illustrative scenario.
A forge does not go from manual to unattended in one step. Forgiron makes the level explicit, auditable and reversible at any time. The first release runs shadow mode, then assist mode, then bounded autonomy on low-risk actions. Press control stays supervised until the part family is qualified.
| Level | What the agent does | What the human does | Where it sits in a pilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| L1 · Shadow | Reads thermal, vision, ultrasonic, MPI, press, die, robot and MES signals; predicts and recommends; writes nothing | Runs the cell as today; compares predictions to inspection and engineer outcomes | Shadow mode, baseline 30 to 60 days |
| L2 · Assist | Proposes heating, press, die-lube, routing and handling actions with evidence, confidence, envelope and rollback path | Approves each action in the review console | Assist mode, the remainder of a 90 to 180 day pilot |
| L3 · Bounded | Executes pre-approved low-risk actions: inspection routing, lube timing, heating and soak adjustments, robot path variants, inside PLC and safety limits | Approves press-schedule changes, die changes and lot release | Graduated autonomy, after audited accuracy and ROI |
| L4 · Scaled | Supervised press-schedule adaptation for qualified part families, across cells and sites | Sets the envelope; reviews the shift record and the evaluation results | Planned; after golden-dataset evaluation, simulation validation and quality sign-off |
These are the figures in our compute plan. None is a measured result. Every pilot measures against the forge's own baseline, reproduced from the plant's own scrap, die and inspection records, not from our telemetry.
Automotive and driveline, aerospace and defense, energy, industrial forgings, ring rolling and open-die. Most forges pick one cell and one wedge, prove the number, then expand.
Crankshafts, connecting rods, gears, axle and suspension parts at rate. Heatrix and Diesmith on the highest-volume cell first, where scrap and unplanned die changes are already counted.
Turbine and engine discs, landing gear and structural forgings under AS9100 and NADCAP. Flawnex on the inspection line, with genealogy and cited disposition from day one.
Turbine, oil and gas and nuclear forgings where a single internal defect is catastrophic. Flawnex and Forgetwin on the part family with the longest qualification cycle.
Closed-die and upsetting lines making industrial parts in many alloys. Forgeon and Diesmith on the press cell with the most changeovers.
Rings and open-die forgings where billet heating is the energy bill and the stroke count is high. Heatrix first, then Forgeon on the mill.
A stroke lasts a fraction of a second and a billet cools while it waits. Perception has to be local, deterministic and fast, so Forgiron runs GPU inference at the plant edge and keeps training, simulation and optimisation in the cloud or on-prem.
8 to 24 cameras per line plus thermal, ultrasonic, MPI, press and ram streams fused at the cell. Sub-100 ms visual alerts and sub-500 ms recommendations are the design targets. Jetson Thor is planned for higher sensor density.
Defect, ultrasonic and MPI fusion, die-wear, heating, press-fill, property and disposition models behind one orchestrator at the plant edge, routed by latency, tenant, sensitivity and cost, with canary rollout by cell.
Multimodal defect, die-wear, heating, press-fill, property and quality-disposition models trained on thermal images, high-speed vision, ultrasonic and MPI signals, press curves and engineer corrections. Dedicated training capacity is planned.
Billet heating, die thermal state, press stroke, fill, stress, die load and robot handling simulated before the stroke. GPU forging FEM is the workload; physics-informed surrogates are planned so recipes rank at production cadence.
Rare lap, fold, underfill, crack and die-wear scenarios generated and validated against real inspection distributions before promotion. Planned.
Die allocation, press sequencing, heating batches, heat-treat queues, robot and takt coordination and inspection routing.
Hot billet, forging, die and trim handling skills trained and validated in simulation before they run next to a press.
Daily features from thermal, video, ultrasonic, MPI, press and genealogy data for retraining, drift detection and yield, scrap, die-life and energy benchmarks.
The Forgiron SDK is typed Python. Tools are declared with schemas, limits and the qualified process envelope, and the policy engine enforces them at call time, not in a review meeting. This is a design preview; the API will change before release.
# Design preview. Bound the heating agent to induction heater IH-2.
from forgiron import Agent, Tool, Limit, Autonomy
power = Tool(
name="induction.set_power",
tags=["IH2.STAGE3_KW", "IH2.SOAK_S"],
limits=[Limit(max_step="4%", per="60s", envelope="42CrMo4-CR118")],
)
heat = Agent(
id="agent.heat_billet",
goal="surface 1180 to 1230 C, core-to-surface spread <= 20 C, least kWh",
tools=[power, Tool("pyro.read_surface", read_only=True)],
# bounded writes on heating; press schedule stays with a human
autonomy=Autonomy.L3,
# simulate on the twin before every write
verify="twin",
)
run = heat.start(cell="F-2", part="CR-42CrMo4-118")
for step in run.stream():
print(step.name, step.status, step.duration)
The same run engine, the same policy checks, the same audit trail, from the terminal, the review console or the SDK. Design preview.
$ forgiron run "lot CR-42CrMo4-118 on F-2" --autonomy L2+
→ plan composed 10 steps · 1 approval gate
→ twin.simulate 24 candidates · best #9 · lap risk 0.08
→ policy.evaluate 7 writes permitted · press_schedule held for human
→ executing heat.soak ........ ok 2m10s
→ executing die.spray ........ ok 48s
! approval required press_schedule blow2 −3%
→ approved shift forging engineer · 05:47:31
→ executing forge.stroke ..... ok 1m36s
→ executing inspect.fuse ..... ok continuous
→ scenario complete laps escaped 0 · lot L-80412 released
$ forgiron runs show run_7c2e41 --format genealogy
Land on one workflow with a measured baseline. Expand by cell, module and autonomy level. Outcome components are available on yield, scrap, die life and energy. Annual prepay carries a 15 to 20% discount.
Heating or forging control, die management, or inspection AI for one cell. For forges validating ROI on the wedge.
The whole forge: heat and billet, forge and press, die and lube, trim and heat-treat, defect, quality and property, yield and takt, robotic handling and the twin.
Multi-site forging groups standardising on Forgiron, with custom alloy, die and qualification models.
We have no customer quotes to show yet and will not invent any. These are the three roles in a forge we build for, and the problems they bring to the first meeting.
What this person is dealing with today
What this person is dealing with today
What this person is dealing with today
Forgiron reads and writes through the systems already on the floor. No rip and replace, no parallel historian, no new HMI to learn. Vendor names are examples of systems found in forges, not certified integrations; connector availability is confirmed per site.
Induction and furnace PLCs (EFD Induction, Ajax TOCCO, Inductotherm, SMS group class systems)
Power, zone and soak reads, guarded writes
Press, hammer and ring-mill controls (SMS group, Schuler, Ajax, Sumitomo and Nedschroef, Danieli class systems)
Force, ram and energy reads; supervised schedule writes
Spray, lubrication and die-cooling systems
Dose, pattern, timing and cooling
Thermal cameras, pyrometers, high-speed cameras at the press
Billet and die temperature, fill, surface defects
Ultrasonic and MPI stations and dimensional systems (Waygate, Evident, Magnaflux class systems)
Scans, indications and dimensions per part
Forging FEM packages (Transvalor Forge, Simufact Forming, QForm, DEFORM class tools)
Model and result exchange with the twin
Robots, manipulators and safety PLCs
Pose, grip and path state inside interlocked limits
Austenitize, quench and temper furnaces
Zone, quench and temper reads, guarded writes
Forgiron writes to production equipment. Every capability is scoped, every write is policy-checked against the qualified envelope, and every action is written to an append-only audit log the forge owns.
| Item | Scope | Status |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type I | Cloud control plane | QUEUED Planned, first 6 months |
| SOC 2 Type II | Cloud control plane | QUEUED Planned, 6 to 12 months |
| SSO and RBAC | Console and approvals | QUEUED Planned, 6 to 12 months |
| AS9100 and NADCAP assurance packages | Disposition and genealogy evidence | QUEUED Planned, 6 to 12 months; not a certification claim |
| Standards-cited reasoning | AS9100, IATF 16949, NADCAP, ASTM documents | RUNNING In the design, every answer cites its source |
| Per-tenant and die-IP isolation | Recipes, die designs, models, memory | RUNNING In the design from day one |
| On-prem and plant-edge deployment | Sensitive producers | RUNNING Design option |
One policy model, one audit trail, one benchmark across every cell in every forge, with the alloy, die and qualification models kept private to each site.
The questions plant directors, forging engineers and quality engineers ask in the first meeting.
Yes, but only within an explicit tag allow-list with per-tag rate and magnitude limits, inside the qualified process envelope, and only at the autonomy level your plant has set. Design partners start in shadow mode, where Forgiron writes nothing. Press-schedule changes stay supervised by a named forging engineer until the part family is qualified.
Control returns to the furnace, press or die controller's last known-good state. Forgiron is a supervisory layer on top of the PLCs and interlocks you already run, never a replacement for them, so an outage degrades the cell to its current way of running, not to a stop.
Advisory recommendations start from the physics-based twin and the part spec in the first weeks. Defect, die-wear and heating prediction improve as cell history and labelled outcomes accumulate per part family. The first training sets are sized at 2 million labelled frames and signals, 20,000 heat and press cycles and 10,000 die-life events per design-partner cohort, all design targets.
Only if you choose cloud training. Die designs, part drawings, recipes, process models and quality records are isolated per tenant and never used to train another customer's models. A fully on-prem deployment at the plant edge is available for sensitive producers, and federated learning across sites is planned and waits on data-rights agreements.
You are, the same as with any control strategy, which is why every write is policy-checked, bounded, logged and reversible, and why anything above your risk threshold waits for a named approver. The audit log records the request, the evidence, the envelope applied and the human decision.
A paid pilot of 90 to 180 days on one cell, scoped to a single wedge with a success metric written into the order form: defect-detection accuracy, scrap reduction, die-change reduction, energy reduction or first-pass-quality improvement. The first 30 to 60 days baseline scrap, die life, energy, inspection escapes and takt in shadow mode.
Start with one heating, press, die or inspection cell and one measurable baseline. A paid pilot on billet heating and press fill, die life or ultrasonic and MPI defect detection shows the number before you commit further.
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc close